The necessity of wholesome human resources management, By Bolutife Oluwadele

The necessity of wholesome human resources management, By Bolutife Oluwadele

The Nigerian government’s recent “no work, no pay” stance in relation to striking doctors is a classic case of the lackadaisical attitude of employers of labour to the concerns and aspirations of the workforce. The contributions of the workforce are grossly undermined, to say the least. It is about time we have a change of attitude to the most crucial resource we will ever need to run our businesses, both in production and services.

A keen observer of industrial relations in Nigeria would notice the usual one-way wage negotiation occupying the centre of discourse, both from the perspective of workers and employers. While the former is incessant in asking for increment in remuneration, the latter always points to economic indices to justify the reasonableness of maintaining the status quo.

Admittedly, wage negotiations can hardly be ignored in Industrial relations, the undue emphasis on it is not in the best interest of industrial development, with which industrial relations serve as a catalyst. Industrial relations extend far beyond wage negotiation if a reasonable level of development is ever to be achieved. Based on this, the management of human resources needs to be x-rayed in order to consider the extent to which it is efficiently carried out or otherwise.

Human resources are related to the input of man into the production of goods and services. It ranges from the mental ability to the physical dissipation of energy necessary for production and other resources. With this, it is no doubt that human resources occupy a central position within which the development of other resources depend. Therefore, the totality of production processes is derived and stem from human resources.

Despite the critical nature of human resources, it has become one of the most difficult of all other resources, in terms of placing an appropriate value and evaluating its essence in harnessing other resources. While it might be pretty easy to determine the volume and number of materials needed to achieve a particular production level, even where the number of human resources to employ can be reasonably determined, placing an appropriate value on such has not been particularly an accomplished mission. Aside from the issue of quantity determination, the sourcing of such other resources is given priority attention over and above human resources; however, human resources are still required from the planning stage to the implementation state of all our production processes.

READ ALSO:  Political solution still being pursued, says Ekweremadu

In terms of this lack of rendering human resources its right of place, could it have been (if one may ask) the level of appreciation of its importance or the satisfaction of its abundance? Why would everything be done to source other resources before consideration is given to what is known as a primary resource? Is it because human resource is under the close control of managers vis-a-vis that it is readily available and no one bothers to give himself sleepless nights over its sourcing?

In Africa, generally, and Nigeria, in particular, the level of our human resource management is abysmal. It is often left to find its level within the production cycle. Its priority of place is neglected in the background. Most feasibility studies of high standards emphasise material and capital sources; they hardly delve into measuring the required level of human resources to achieve the expected results.

There are so many questions on the neglect of human resources, which have gotten so few answers to explain its neglect. In Africa, generally, and Nigeria, in particular, the level of our human resource management is abysmal. It is often left to find its level within the production cycle. Its priority of place is neglected in the background. Most feasibility studies of high standards emphasise material and capital sources; they hardly delve into measuring the required level of human resources to achieve the expected results. It may get to the extent of discussing the effect of inflation on the country and financing of the required material. At the same time, no mention is made of the same effect this will have on the psychology of the workforce that essentially constitutes the human resources. To eliminate the desirability of a project, the effect of human resources is kept constant, while the effect of other resources is closely monitored and evaluated.

This position may not change in a long time to come. As materials are often used and forgotten, their effect must be monitored closely, as capital is required. Any wrong decision in this regard may spell out doom; hence it also requires close monitoring. Nevertheless, on the other hand, human resources, though very important, can be made flexible to accommodate whatever circumstance. Little wonder why workers have no confidence in the production cycle as such, and the main concern is how much accrues to the pocket at the end of the day’s labour.

READ ALSO:  Ebonyi govt dismisses report on cholera outbreak, death

An average production manager is strictly concerned about managing the raw material to reduce the level of wastage. He has little time to think about the psychological trauma that the worker is going through, even when this can reduce such a worker’s production capacity to zero levels. Anyway, if the worker misbehaves, he/she will be fired, and another hired in his/her place from a market that is already saturated with labour. The average worker has no goal and aspiration that is to be paid any attention, even when this is congruent with the organisational goal.

What stake then has the worker in the outcome of the production process, one may ask? Nothing! Absolutely nothing. Nevertheless, he must be compensated for his effort, and the only compensation is the regular wages paid to him. He/she also believes that this must be sufficiently paid to at least energise him/her for further usage.

While I feel strongly that the management of our human resources is at the lowest ebb, a genuine change of attitude by our managers from the present one will go a long way in installing improved managed human resources and therefore achieving exceptional results in society.

As a result of this unfortunate neglect in the encouragement or motivation to show more empathy to the workforce, wage negotiation has been the one and possibly the only focus of our industrial relations. Managers should consider devising better approaches to appreciating our abundant human resources and, hence, implement effective and efficient management of such. We are not getting the best out of our human resources, and this is due to the neglect of the importance that should have ordinarily been accorded it.

READ ALSO:  BBNaija: Wathoni apologises for body shaming Dorathy

With a complete change of heart in relation to the welfare and the aspiration of the labour force, a significant shift would be achieved by way of increased production of goods and services, and better industrial relations that is constantly being dominated by wage negotiations. We need to give the Nigerian labour force its pride of place and bring efficiency into the goods we produce and the services we render.

The Nigerian government’s recent “no work, no pay” stance in relation to striking doctors is a classic case of the lackadaisical attitude of employers of labour to the concerns and aspirations of the workforce. The contributions of the workforce are grossly undermined, to say the least. It is about time we have a change of attitude to the most crucial resource we will ever need to run our businesses, both in production and services. No single system can survive, let alone become profitable if the human resource does not play its vital role. If we understand and recognise this, new strategies have to emerge to manage our human resources better. This is a collective responsibility far beyond the mere purview of human resources managers or industrial relations practitioners. A new orientation has to be fashioned by all and sundry, and this archaic and unproductive wage negotiation paradigm should be entirely replaced with influential stakeholder management. There is no doubt that employees should be seen and treated as primary stakeholders in any forward-looking organisation.

While I feel strongly that the management of our human resources is at the lowest ebb, a genuine change of attitude by our managers from the present one will go a long way in installing improved managed human resources and therefore achieving exceptional results in society.

Bolutife Oluwadele, a chartered accountant and a public policy and administration scholar, writes from Canada. He is the author of Thoughts of A Village Boy andcan be reached through: bolutife.oluwadele@gmail.com

Source

Click for More News



%d bloggers like this: